Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zoe Kruger vs Suzan Lamens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kruger vs Lamens analysis and find out who is favored!
Zoe Kruger vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kruger 1 - 0 Lamens
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kruger has won 20.45% of points on their second serve, while Lamens has won 45.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kruger, in recent form, has won 48.28% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 57.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 41.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kruger has saved 23.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 54.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kruger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Lamens winning 62.34% (W/L 48/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kruger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 42/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 22/ 23). Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 176/ 113), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Kruger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 40/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kruger winning 1 times and Lamens being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kruger winning 2 and Lamens winning 1. The last match between Kruger and Lamens was at the W25 Pretoria, 03-10-2021, Final, Hard with Zoe Kruger getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kruger and Lamens have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kruger winning 1 times and Lamens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kruger winning 0, and Lamens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kruger has played against opponents with an average rank of 796 while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 224.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kruger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kruger has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 49.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
510
Rank
424
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
140
Rank
131
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
52% (64-58)
Career Total W/L
58% (265-192)
0% (0-2)
YTD W/L
68% (26-12)
$1,020
Career Prize Money
$81,693
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Zoe Kruger vs Suzan Lamens For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kruger VS Lamens
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Zoe Kruger | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zoe Kruger | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/2) | 68% (26/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 60% (54/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 23% (7/24) | 55% (447/361) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 76% (13/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (11/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 85 |
| DFs per game | 0.67 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 796 | 216.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (47/91) | 62% (1487/2414) |
| 1st Serve W% | 43% (20/47) | 63% (942/1487) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 20% (9/44) | 45% (418/927) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (4/8) | 50% (163/327) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (33/86) | 47% (1181/2490) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 75% (18/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 68% (25/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 85% (11/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 38% (16/6) |
Zoe Kruger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Manon Leonard
Player
Zoe Kruger
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve %
34%
(
12 of
35)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Zoe Kruger
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Zoe Kruger
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Zoe Kruger
68%
(
77 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
51%
(
58 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
59 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Zoe Kruger
45%
(
31 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Zoe Kruger
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoe Kruger
Player
Yui Chikaraishi
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Kruger
Player
Naiktha Bains
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
105)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Zoe Kruger
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zoe Kruger
Player
Alena Fomina
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Suzan Lamens
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Suzan Lamens
39%
(
17 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Bernarda Pera
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
107)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Suzan Lamens
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Unknown Player
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Suzan Lamens
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Clara Tauson
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
49%
(
55 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kruger Vs Lamens Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kruger are available here and Lamens photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
